
In counties in the South, local governments are beginning to adopt policies that can allow work places to screen for nicotine in pre-employment tests. The main objective is to keep "health care costs down". The policy encourages workplaces to not hire smokers.I am to analyze this policy and determine what are employees and employers responsibilities in workplace healthcare?I'm drawing a blank on how to approach this, namely in locating good sources on how workplaces cut employee health care costs to increase profits.I understand that this kind of policy would inevitably lead to the detriment of the working class, especially Black, and Latinx workers whom, according to current data collected by the CDC, make up large portion of smokers. Additionally, it would create conditions of further driving people into poverty, as those in poverty make up a significant amount of smokers (https://ift.tt/31oOnIr do not know if this kind of work is pointless in terms of praxis but I have dedicated time towards agitation in graduate school for public health. Many in my program see an issue with for-profit healthcare but do not have a solution outside the market. I use discussion posts as an opportunity to engage with them and this is one of those that I'm having a tough time locating sources for.Would any comrades be willing to help? via /r/communism https://ift.tt/2vIIDgE
No comments:
Post a Comment