It’s not a matter 😱 of belief 🌈. Science 🔬 involves ♎🎐 hypotheses, which are then tested 🔬🤓.
It doesn’t matter 🙅 what you 👈 believe 🌈, it doesn’t change 🚼 the outcomes 🤷♂️ of the experiment 🔬.
The results 👀💯 vary ⚔ depending 🔙 on 🔛 -What the material 😡 of the mask 🎭 is -The duration ⏰ of wear 👙 -The conditions 👱♀️ under 😡 which it is worn 🙁 -Sanitation 🚱🚰 before 😂, during, and after 2️⃣ -Whether 🌩 the mask 😷 is reused 🔄 -Whether 🌩🌧 the mask 😷 is touched 🤚 at all 💯
Even 🌃 after 👀 all 🅱😤 is said 💬 and done 🔨 it’s interesting 🤔 that hand 🤲 washing 🚿 is much 😩😂🙀 more effective 💀 at slowing 🐌 the spread 👐.
Then you 👈 have to look 👁 at how the study 📿⛪ was conducted 🛩. Was it in vivo? Was it randomized? Were all 💯 confounding variables 👶🏽 accounted for? Was the study 📿⛪ peer 👥 reviewed? Who was it funded 💰 by? Also 👨, the integrity 😤 of the study 🔬. You 👉🏻 have to read ⁉📖 the methodology to determine 😤 the strength 💪 of the study 📿⛪. You 😎👉 also 👨 need 👉 to read 📖 the results 👀💯, not just the conclusion 🔚 and discussion 🗣👄 portion 👌😞 because many 👬 scientists 🔬 will attempt 🚫 to favor 🤝 their hypothesis.
And when 🍑 all 💯 is said 💬😍 and done 🔨, you 👈 need 👉 to conduct 🕵🏽♂️ a risk-benefit analysis 📝 and determine 🤔 if the variable ⚔ you 👉 isolated 🍆🔥 makes ⛏🛠 enough 💦 of a difference ⁉ to be the best 🏆🥇 course 🏎 of action 🎭. Example 🔥: masks 💀😷 vs 😯 social 👥 distancing 👩👦👨👩👦👦👩👩👦👦. Masks 😷 vs 😯 hand ✋ washing 🚿. Cloth ⚠ vs 📧®🅰 paper 🧻 masks 🌪🎭. Masks 🎭😞 vs 😯 herd 🚶 immunity 😷. And in each of these cases 💼, your 👉🏼👩🏼 suggested 👀 course 🏎 of action 🎭 will not likely 😠 be the same across ➡ all 💯 demographics 📈📊🤓. How do the suggested 👀 actions 🎭 vary ⚔ among 😂 age 👵? Among 💑👨❤️👨👩❤️👩 community 👩? Among 💰 high 🕛 risk 😐?
Attempting 🙋 to narrow 🏦📃📦 down ⬇ your 👉 agenda 🈸📔 to 1 🎄 piece 🧩 of what you 👈 profess 📖 to be “science” is dishonest and an attempt 🙋 at moral 👿😇 and intellectual 👓📖 superiority 👁👃.
Submitted November 09, 2020 at 07:08PM by yourTokenCellist https://ift.tt/35gF00E
No comments:
Post a Comment